Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PEMBINA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PEMBINA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 351319 | ND | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-651K → Pro Forma $278K (+$929K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-651K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$929K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$278K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$677K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$929K
Modeled Uplift
$555K
Risk-Adjusted
-$373K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$353K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$350K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$215K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$929K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$353K$353K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$340K$10K$350K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$161K$215K$677K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT89.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$177K$265K$353K$353K$353K$353K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$175K$262K$350K$350K$350K$350K
A/R Days Reduction$0$72K$143K$215K$215K$215K$215K$215K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$253K$506K$753K$929K$929K$929K$929K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $929K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-19.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
26.3x
Headroom (turns)
405%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 405% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -19.8x, adding 118.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-651K$-651K-3.7%
Year 1$-671K+$619K$-52K-0.3%
Year 2$-691K+$929K$238K1.3%
Year 3$-712K+$929K$217K1.2%
Year 4$-733K+$929K$196K1.1%
Year 5$-755K+$929K$174K1.0%
$-6.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.4M
Value Created
$174K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$9.3M
RCM Value Creation
$174K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$177K$265K$353K$424K
Denial Rate Reductio$175K$262K$350K$419K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$161K$215K$258K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$14K
Total$464K$697K$929K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.7%-20.4%-9.3%-3.7%
P73
Net-to-Gross72.1%59.3%76.6%89.5%
P41
Occupancy13.0%13.5%22.7%45.7%
P22
Rev/Bed$883K$458K$642K$1.0M
P62
Exp/Bed$915K$527K$697K$1.3M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML