Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD MAYVILLE 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANFORD MAYVILLE
CCN 351309 | ND | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $348K → Pro Forma $1.0M (+$676K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$348K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$676K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$491K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$676K
Modeled Uplift
$404K
Risk-Adjusted
-$271K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$256K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$254K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$676K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$256K$256K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$246K$8K$254K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$116K$156K$491K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT88.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$192K$256K$256K$256K$256K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$127K$191K$254K$254K$254K$254K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$184K$368K$548K$676K$676K$676K$676K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $676K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x90% / 24.4x91% / 25.7x93% / 27.0x
9.0x76% / 16.9x80% / 19.1x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x88% / 23.6x
10.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
11.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
12.0x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$348K$348K2.7%
Year 1$359K+$450K$809K6.3%
Year 2$370K+$676K$1.0M8.2%
Year 3$381K+$676K$1.1M8.3%
Year 4$392K+$676K$1.1M8.3%
Year 5$404K+$676K$1.1M8.4%
$3.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.4M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$555K
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$192K$256K$307K
Denial Rate Reductio$127K$191K$254K$305K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$187K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$338K$507K$676K$811K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-20.4%-9.3%-2.2%
P89
Net-to-Gross79.7%55.0%76.0%88.5%
P65
Occupancy19.8%15.5%28.3%51.9%
P34
Rev/Bed$512K$450K$633K$976K
P32
Exp/Bed$498K$501K$630K$1.1M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML