Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
CCN 351302 | ND | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.7M → Pro Forma $-6.4M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$852K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$862K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$854K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$525K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$862K$862K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$830K$24K$854K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$132K$392K$525K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT89.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$216K$431K$647K$862K$862K$862K$862K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$213K$427K$640K$854K$854K$854K$854K
A/R Days Reduction$0$175K$350K$525K$525K$525K$525K$525K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$618K$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.7M$-8.7M-20.2%
Year 1$-9.0M+$1.5M$-7.4M-17.3%
Year 2$-9.2M+$2.3M$-7.0M-16.1%
Year 3$-9.5M+$2.3M$-7.2M-16.8%
Year 4$-9.8M+$2.3M$-7.5M-17.4%
Year 5$-10.1M+$2.3M$-7.8M-18.1%
$-87.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-86.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.0M
Value Created
$-7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.9M
Organic Growth
$22.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$431K$647K$862K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$427K$640K$854K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$262K$393K$525K$629K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.2%-20.4%-9.0%-2.4%
P26
Net-to-Gross65.5%55.3%76.3%89.2%
P34
Occupancy19.6%13.7%26.3%48.4%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.8M$452K$636K$1.0M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.2M$513K$695K$1.3M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML