Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STRATEGIC BEHAVIORAL CENTER LELAND 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STRATEGIC BEHAVIORAL CENTER LELAND
CCN 344030 | NC | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$752K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$698K
Risk-Adjusted
-$334K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$392K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$388K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$239K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$392K$392K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$377K$11K$388K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$178K$239K$752K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$196K$294K$392K$392K$392K$392K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$388K$388K$388K$388K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$159K$239K$239K$239K$239K$239K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$281K$562K$837K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M7.4%
Year 1$1.5M+$688K$2.2M11.1%
Year 2$1.5M+$1.0M$2.6M13.1%
Year 3$1.6M+$1.0M$2.6M13.3%
Year 4$1.6M+$1.0M$2.7M13.5%
Year 5$1.7M+$1.0M$2.7M13.8%
$14.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.3M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$2.3M
Organic Growth
$10.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$196K$294K$392K$471K
Denial Rate Reductio$194K$291K$388K$466K
A/R Days Reduction$119K$179K$239K$286K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$516K$774K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.4%-16.1%-3.5%7.0%
P75
Net-to-Gross42.0%26.9%32.7%41.3%
P75
Occupancy51.8%38.6%51.8%68.2%
P49
Rev/Bed$490K$519K$1.3M$2.0M
P21
Exp/Bed$454K$603K$1.4M$2.1M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML