Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JULIAN F KEITH - ADATC 2026-04-26 09:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JULIAN F KEITH - ADATC
CCN 344023 | NC | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $3.8M → Pro Forma $5.6M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$663K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$687K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$680K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$418K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$687K$687K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$662K$19K$680K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$313K$418K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$172K$344K$515K$687K$687K$687K$687K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$170K$340K$510K$680K$680K$680K$680K
A/R Days Reduction$0$139K$279K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$492K$985K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.8M$3.8M11.1%
Year 1$3.9M+$1.2M$5.1M14.9%
Year 2$4.0M+$1.8M$5.8M17.0%
Year 3$4.2M+$1.8M$6.0M17.3%
Year 4$4.3M+$1.8M$6.1M17.7%
Year 5$4.4M+$1.8M$6.2M18.1%
$38.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$68.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$30.3M
Value Created
$6.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.0M
Organic Growth
$18.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$344K$515K$687K$825K
Denial Rate Reductio$340K$510K$680K$817K
A/R Days Reduction$209K$314K$418K$502K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$904K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.1%-8.4%-1.5%12.0%
P73
Net-to-Gross100.0%23.4%28.7%37.6%
P95
Occupancy49.3%42.7%54.3%71.2%
P34
Rev/Bed$430K$528K$1.2M$1.7M
P15
Exp/Bed$382K$605K$1.2M$1.6M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML