Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OLD VINEYARD 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OLD VINEYARD
CCN 344007 | NC | 164 beds | Current EBITDA $8.3M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$538K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$723K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$716K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$440K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$723K$723K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$696K$20K$716K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$329K$440K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$181K$362K$543K$723K$723K$723K$723K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$179K$358K$537K$716K$716K$716K$716K
A/R Days Reduction$0$147K$293K$440K$440K$440K$440K$440K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$518K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.3M$8.3M22.9%
Year 1$8.5M+$1.3M$9.8M27.1%
Year 2$8.8M+$1.9M$10.7M29.6%
Year 3$9.1M+$1.9M$11.0M30.3%
Year 4$9.3M+$1.9M$11.2M31.1%
Year 5$9.6M+$1.9M$11.5M31.9%
$83.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$126.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.8M
Value Created
$11.5M
Exit EBITDA
$13.2M
Organic Growth
$19.0M
RCM Value Creation
$11.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$362K$543K$723K$868K
Denial Rate Reductio$358K$537K$716K$859K
A/R Days Reduction$220K$330K$440K$528K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$951K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.9%-6.6%-1.2%7.5%
P94
Net-to-Gross43.4%23.4%28.2%34.2%
P96
Occupancy85.1%48.1%58.2%72.8%
P92
Rev/Bed$221K$760K$1.2M$1.7M
P6
Exp/Bed$170K$744K$1.2M$1.5M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML