Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGHSMITH RAINEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGHSMITH RAINEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 342014 | NC | 66 beds | Current EBITDA $-10.9M → Pro Forma $-9.2M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$466K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$643K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$636K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$391K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$643K$643K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$619K$18K$636K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$99K$292K$391K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$161K$321K$482K$643K$643K$643K$643K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$159K$318K$477K$636K$636K$636K$636K
A/R Days Reduction$0$130K$261K$391K$391K$391K$391K$391K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$460K$921K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-10.9M$-10.9M-33.9%
Year 1$-11.2M+$1.1M$-10.1M-31.4%
Year 2$-11.6M+$1.7M$-9.9M-30.7%
Year 3$-11.9M+$1.7M$-10.2M-31.8%
Year 4$-12.3M+$1.7M$-10.6M-32.9%
Year 5$-12.6M+$1.7M$-11.0M-34.1%
$-109.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-120.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-11.4M
Value Created
$-11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-17.4M
Organic Growth
$16.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$321K$482K$643K$771K
Denial Rate Reductio$318K$477K$636K$764K
A/R Days Reduction$196K$293K$391K$469K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$21K$25K
Total$845K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-33.9%-10.7%-2.3%10.7%
P6
Net-to-Gross21.0%22.6%28.5%37.7%
P16
Occupancy79.7%40.3%52.3%71.7%
P88
Rev/Bed$487K$494K$1.1M$1.5M
P22
Exp/Bed$652K$549K$1.1M$1.6M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML