Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — J ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — J ARTHUR DOSHER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 341327 | NC | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $5.2M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$57.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$700K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$177K$524K$700K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$288K$576K$863K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$285K$570K$855K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$233K$467K$700K$700K$700K$700K$700K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$825K$1.6M$2.5M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x
9.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
10.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x
11.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x71% / 14.8x
12.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M3.8%
Year 1$2.2M+$2.0M$4.3M7.4%
Year 2$2.3M+$3.0M$5.3M9.3%
Year 3$2.4M+$3.0M$5.4M9.4%
Year 4$2.5M+$3.0M$5.5M9.5%
Year 5$2.5M+$3.0M$5.6M9.6%
$21.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.3M
Value Created
$5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$30.3M
RCM Value Creation
$5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$576K$863K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$570K$855K$1.1M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$350K$525K$700K$840K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$28K$37K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.8%-22.0%-4.3%5.1%
P68
Net-to-Gross36.0%24.7%32.7%39.9%
P61
Occupancy23.2%32.5%43.8%67.5%
P15
Rev/Bed$2.3M$545K$1.4M$2.0M
P79
Exp/Bed$2.2M$618K$1.4M$2.1M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML