Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BLADEN COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BLADEN COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 341315 | NC | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $781K → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$781K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$590K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$755K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$748K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$459K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$755K$755K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$727K$21K$748K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$344K$459K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$378K$566K$755K$755K$755K$755K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$374K$561K$748K$748K$748K$748K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$459K$459K$459K$459K$459K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$541K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x89% / 23.8x93% / 26.8x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.3x101% / 32.8x
9.0x84% / 20.8x88% / 23.5x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.5x96% / 28.8x
10.0x79% / 18.4x84% / 20.8x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x
11.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x84% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x
12.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
63%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 63% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$781K$781K2.1%
Year 1$805K+$1.3M$2.1M5.6%
Year 2$829K+$2.0M$2.8M7.5%
Year 3$854K+$2.0M$2.8M7.5%
Year 4$880K+$2.0M$2.9M7.6%
Year 5$906K+$2.0M$2.9M7.7%
$7.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.0M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$378K$566K$755K$906K
Denial Rate Reductio$374K$561K$748K$897K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$345K$459K$551K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$993K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-22.0%-4.3%5.1%
P66
Net-to-Gross33.7%24.7%32.7%39.9%
P53
Occupancy61.3%32.5%43.8%67.5%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.5M$545K$1.4M$2.0M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.5M$618K$1.4M$2.1M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML