Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PENDER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PENDER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 341307 | NC | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-411K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-411K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$590K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$678K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$671K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$412K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$678K$678K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$652K$19K$671K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$308K$412K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$169K$339K$508K$678K$678K$678K$678K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$335K$503K$671K$671K$671K$671K
A/R Days Reduction$0$137K$275K$412K$412K$412K$412K$412K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$485K$971K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.0x
Headroom (turns)
139%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 139% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.5x, adding 101.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-411K$-411K-1.2%
Year 1$-424K+$1.2M$765K2.3%
Year 2$-436K+$1.8M$1.3M4.0%
Year 3$-450K+$1.8M$1.3M3.9%
Year 4$-463K+$1.8M$1.3M3.9%
Year 5$-477K+$1.8M$1.3M3.9%
$-4.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.5M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-655K
Organic Growth
$17.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$339K$508K$678K$813K
Denial Rate Reductio$335K$503K$671K$805K
A/R Days Reduction$206K$309K$412K$495K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$891K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.2%-22.0%-4.3%5.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross32.5%24.7%32.7%39.9%
P47
Occupancy43.8%32.5%43.8%67.5%
P49
Rev/Bed$1.4M$545K$1.4M$2.0M
P47
Exp/Bed$1.4M$618K$1.4M$2.1M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML