Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL HUNTERSVILLE 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL HUNTERSVILLE
CCN 340183 | NC | 135 beds | Current EBITDA $60.2M → Pro Forma $74.7M (+$14.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$276.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$60.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$74.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$14.6M
Modeled Uplift
$10.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.4M (vs $14.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$177K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$152K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$849K$2.5M$3.4M$10.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$177K$177K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$177K$177K$177K$177K$177K$177K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$7.9M$11.8M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$60.2M$60.2M21.8%
Year 1$62.0M+$9.7M$71.7M25.9%
Year 2$63.8M+$14.6M$78.4M28.3%
Year 3$65.8M+$14.6M$80.3M29.0%
Year 4$67.7M+$14.6M$82.3M29.7%
Year 5$69.8M+$14.6M$84.3M30.5%
$601.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$927.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$325.7M
Value Created
$84.3M
Exit EBITDA
$95.8M
Organic Growth
$145.5M
RCM Value Creation
$84.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$133K$177K$212K
Total$7.3M$10.9M$14.6M$17.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.8%-7.1%-1.3%6.9%
P91
Net-to-Gross30.3%24.4%28.8%36.1%
P62
Occupancy68.6%47.5%58.1%73.5%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.0M$738K$1.3M$1.7M
P87
Exp/Bed$1.6M$738K$1.3M$1.6M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML