Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WAKE MED CARY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WAKE MED CARY HOSPITAL
CCN 340173 | NC | 189 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.6M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$16.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$318.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$16.7M
Modeled Uplift
$12.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.6M (vs $16.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$204K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$175K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$976K$2.9M$3.9M$12.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$204K$204K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$102K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.1M$13.6M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-19.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
25.6x
Headroom (turns)
394%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 394% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -19.1x, adding 118.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.6M$-11.6M-3.6%
Year 1$-12.0M+$11.2M$-795K-0.2%
Year 2$-12.3M+$16.7M$4.4M1.4%
Year 3$-12.7M+$16.7M$4.1M1.3%
Year 4$-13.1M+$16.7M$3.7M1.2%
Year 5$-13.5M+$16.7M$3.3M1.0%
$-116.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$36.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$152.2M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.5M
Organic Growth
$167.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$102K$153K$204K$244K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.7M$20.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.6%-7.4%-1.2%8.4%
P36
Net-to-Gross24.7%23.7%27.6%33.5%
P30
Occupancy89.4%48.8%58.4%74.5%
P94
Rev/Bed$1.7M$801K$1.2M$1.7M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.7M$779K$1.2M$1.6M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML