Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH UNIVERSITY CITY 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH UNIVERSITY CITY
CCN 340166 | NC | 104 beds | Current EBITDA $82.0M → Pro Forma $97.0M (+$15.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$286.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$82.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$97.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

80%
Realization (B)
$15.1M
Modeled Uplift
$12.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 80% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.1M (vs $15.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$184K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.7M$5.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$158K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$880K$2.6M$3.5M$11.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.2M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$82.0M$82.0M28.6%
Year 1$84.4M+$10.1M$94.5M32.9%
Year 2$86.9M+$15.1M$102.0M35.6%
Year 3$89.6M+$15.1M$104.6M36.5%
Year 4$92.2M+$15.1M$107.3M37.4%
Year 5$95.0M+$15.1M$110.1M38.4%
$819.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.21B
Exit EV (11x)
$391.6M
Value Created
$110.1M
Exit EBITDA
$130.5M
Organic Growth
$150.9M
RCM Value Creation
$110.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$138K$184K$220K
Total$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.6%-8.7%-1.5%6.9%
P98
Net-to-Gross23.3%24.5%28.8%34.6%
P19
Occupancy108.4%46.1%58.3%74.2%
P98
Rev/Bed$2.8M$689K$1.3M$1.8M
P93
Exp/Bed$2.0M$698K$1.3M$1.7M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML