Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DUKE REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 340155 | NC | 301 beds | Current EBITDA $-83.5M → Pro Forma $-61.3M (+$22.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$421.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-83.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-61.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$22.1M
Modeled Uplift
$15.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.6M (vs $22.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$269K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.4M$8.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.1M$232K$8.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$16.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$269K$269K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$135K$269K$269K$269K$269K$269K$269K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$12.1M$18.0M$22.1M$22.1M$22.1M$22.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-83.5M$-83.5M-19.8%
Year 1$-86.0M+$14.8M$-71.2M-16.9%
Year 2$-88.6M+$22.1M$-66.4M-15.8%
Year 3$-91.2M+$22.1M$-69.1M-16.4%
Year 4$-94.0M+$22.1M$-71.8M-17.1%
Year 5$-96.8M+$22.1M$-74.6M-17.7%
$-834.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-821.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.9M
Value Created
$-74.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-133.0M
Organic Growth
$221.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-74.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.3M$8.3M$10.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$135K$202K$269K$323K
Total$11.1M$16.6M$22.1M$26.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.8%-3.9%3.7%8.8%
P9
Net-to-Gross28.7%24.9%28.1%33.0%
P53
Occupancy75.0%56.7%68.7%80.9%
P55
Rev/Bed$1.4M$995K$1.5M$1.8M
P41
Exp/Bed$1.7M$914K$1.4M$1.7M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML