Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL PARK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL PARK HOSPITAL
CCN 340148 | NC | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $13.1M → Pro Forma $17.4M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$82.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$53K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$254K$752K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$53K$53K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$413K$826K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$409K$818K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$335K$670K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.1M$13.1M15.8%
Year 1$13.5M+$2.9M$16.4M19.8%
Year 2$13.9M+$4.3M$18.2M22.1%
Year 3$14.3M+$4.3M$18.6M22.6%
Year 4$14.7M+$4.3M$19.1M23.1%
Year 5$15.2M+$4.3M$19.5M23.6%
$130.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$214.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$83.8M
Value Created
$19.5M
Exit EBITDA
$20.8M
Organic Growth
$43.5M
RCM Value Creation
$19.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$826K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$818K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$503K$754K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$40K$53K$63K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.8%-23.3%-6.0%4.7%
P89
Net-to-Gross38.3%25.2%32.7%39.3%
P69
Occupancy20.6%32.2%43.7%67.2%
P14
Rev/Bed$3.8M$544K$1.5M$2.1M
P92
Exp/Bed$3.2M$633K$1.5M$2.2M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML