Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NASH HOSPITALS INC 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NASH HOSPITALS INC
CCN 340147 | NC | 322 beds | Current EBITDA $40.9M → Pro Forma $57.8M (+$16.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$320.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$40.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$57.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$16.9M
Modeled Uplift
$10.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.9M (vs $16.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$205K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$176K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$984K$2.9M$3.9M$12.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$205K$205K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$103K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.7M$16.9M$16.9M$16.9M$16.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$40.9M$40.9M12.8%
Year 1$42.2M+$11.2M$53.4M16.7%
Year 2$43.4M+$16.9M$60.3M18.8%
Year 3$44.7M+$16.9M$61.6M19.2%
Year 4$46.1M+$16.9M$62.9M19.6%
Year 5$47.5M+$16.9M$64.3M20.1%
$409.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$707.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$298.1M
Value Created
$64.3M
Exit EBITDA
$65.2M
Organic Growth
$168.6M
RCM Value Creation
$64.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$103K$154K$205K$246K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.9M$20.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.8%-4.6%1.8%8.8%
P83
Net-to-Gross27.3%24.7%28.7%33.0%
P45
Occupancy50.9%57.3%75.1%81.2%
P13
Rev/Bed$995K$995K$1.4M$1.7M
P24
Exp/Bed$868K$929K$1.4M$1.7M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML