Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH LINCOLN 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH LINCOLN
CCN 340145 | NC | 101 beds | Current EBITDA $32.0M → Pro Forma $39.6M (+$7.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$144.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$32.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$7.6M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $7.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$93K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$80K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$444K$1.3M$1.8M$5.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$93K$93K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$723K$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$716K$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$587K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$46K$93K$93K$93K$93K$93K$93K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$32.0M$32.0M22.2%
Year 1$33.0M+$5.1M$38.1M26.3%
Year 2$34.0M+$7.6M$41.6M28.8%
Year 3$35.0M+$7.6M$42.6M29.5%
Year 4$36.1M+$7.6M$43.7M30.2%
Year 5$37.1M+$7.6M$44.8M30.9%
$320.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$492.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$171.9M
Value Created
$44.8M
Exit EBITDA
$51.0M
Organic Growth
$76.1M
RCM Value Creation
$44.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.9M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$880K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$46K$69K$93K$111K
Total$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.2%-8.6%-1.4%7.0%
P91
Net-to-Gross24.4%24.5%29.2%36.8%
P22
Occupancy59.1%46.8%58.2%74.2%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.4M$688K$1.2M$1.7M
P62
Exp/Bed$1.1M$680K$1.3M$1.6M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML