Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CATAWBA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CATAWBA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340143 | NC | 200 beds | Current EBITDA $26.7M → Pro Forma $50.5M (+$23.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$451.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$23.8M
Modeled Uplift
$16.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.4M (vs $23.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$289K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.0M$9.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.7M$249K$8.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.5M$17.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$289K$289K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$145K$289K$289K$289K$289K$289K$289K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$12.9M$19.3M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
9.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
10.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
11.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
12.0x46% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
31%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 31% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.7M$26.7M5.9%
Year 1$27.5M+$15.9M$43.3M9.6%
Year 2$28.3M+$23.8M$52.1M11.5%
Year 3$29.1M+$23.8M$52.9M11.7%
Year 4$30.0M+$23.8M$53.8M11.9%
Year 5$30.9M+$23.8M$54.7M12.1%
$266.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$601.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$334.9M
Value Created
$54.7M
Exit EBITDA
$42.5M
Organic Growth
$237.8M
RCM Value Creation
$54.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$145K$217K$289K$347K
Total$11.9M$17.8M$23.8M$28.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.9%-8.4%-1.9%7.9%
P70
Net-to-Gross31.0%23.9%27.5%33.6%
P66
Occupancy58.2%44.2%58.7%75.0%
P46
Rev/Bed$2.3M$692K$1.2M$1.6M
P94
Exp/Bed$2.1M$713K$1.2M$1.5M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML