Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEW HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEW HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340141 | NC | 694 beds | Current EBITDA $-237.4M → Pro Forma $-172.9M (+$64.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.22B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-237.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$64.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-172.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$47.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$64.4M
Modeled Uplift
$44.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$20.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $44.2M (vs $64.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$24.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$784K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$64.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.5M$24.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.6M$674K$24.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.8M$11.1M$14.9M$47.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$784K$784K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.4M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.1M$12.1M$18.2M$24.3M$24.3M$24.3M$24.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.0M$9.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$392K$784K$784K$784K$784K$784K$784K
Cumulative$0$17.5M$35.1M$52.3M$64.4M$64.4M$64.4M$64.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $64.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-237.4M$-237.4M-19.4%
Year 1$-244.5M+$43.0M$-201.5M-16.5%
Year 2$-251.8M+$64.4M$-187.4M-15.3%
Year 3$-259.4M+$64.4M$-194.9M-15.9%
Year 4$-267.2M+$64.4M$-202.7M-16.6%
Year 5$-275.2M+$64.4M$-210.7M-17.2%
$-2.37B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.32B
Exit EV (11x)
$55.6M
Value Created
$-210.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-378.1M
Organic Growth
$644.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-210.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.2M$18.4M$24.5M$29.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.1M$18.2M$24.3M$29.1M
A/R Days Reduction$7.5M$11.2M$14.9M$17.9M
Clean Claim Rate$392K$588K$784K$941K
Total$32.2M$48.3M$64.4M$77.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.4%-5.3%-2.2%7.3%
P6
Net-to-Gross26.9%25.6%29.4%31.3%
P39
Occupancy80.2%75.0%79.2%88.3%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.5M$1.8M$2.6M
P44
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.5M$1.7M$2.7M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML