Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE NORMAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE NORMAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340129 | NC | 123 beds | Current EBITDA $32.1M → Pro Forma $39.2M (+$7.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$134.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$32.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$7.1M
Modeled Uplift
$4.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.5M (vs $7.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$86K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$74K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$413K$1.2M$1.6M$5.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$86K$86K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$673K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$667K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$546K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.7M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$32.1M$32.1M23.8%
Year 1$33.0M+$4.7M$37.8M28.0%
Year 2$34.0M+$7.1M$41.1M30.5%
Year 3$35.0M+$7.1M$42.1M31.3%
Year 4$36.1M+$7.1M$43.2M32.1%
Year 5$37.2M+$7.1M$44.3M32.9%
$320.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$486.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$166.2M
Value Created
$44.3M
Exit EBITDA
$51.1M
Organic Growth
$70.8M
RCM Value Creation
$44.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$819K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$65K$86K$103K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.8%-8.1%-1.4%7.0%
P97
Net-to-Gross15.9%24.4%28.8%34.5%
P2
Occupancy32.7%46.8%58.2%74.2%
P8
Rev/Bed$1.1M$716K$1.2M$1.7M
P36
Exp/Bed$834K$732K$1.3M$1.6M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML