Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FIRSTHEALTH MOORE REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:39 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FIRSTHEALTH MOORE REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 340115 | NC | 412 beds | Current EBITDA $71.5M → Pro Forma $114.3M (+$42.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$813.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$71.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$42.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$114.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$31.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$42.8M
Modeled Uplift
$29.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.7M (vs $42.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$16.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$16.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$521K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$42.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$16.3M$16.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.7M$448K$16.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.5M$7.4M$9.9M$31.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$521K$521K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.1M$8.1M$12.2M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.0M$8.1M$12.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$260K$521K$521K$521K$521K$521K$521K
Cumulative$0$11.7M$23.3M$34.7M$42.8M$42.8M$42.8M$42.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $42.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$71.5M$71.5M8.8%
Year 1$73.6M+$28.5M$102.2M12.6%
Year 2$75.8M+$42.8M$118.6M14.6%
Year 3$78.1M+$42.8M$120.9M14.9%
Year 4$80.4M+$42.8M$123.3M15.1%
Year 5$82.9M+$42.8M$125.7M15.4%
$714.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.38B
Exit EV (11x)
$667.7M
Value Created
$125.7M
Exit EBITDA
$113.8M
Organic Growth
$428.1M
RCM Value Creation
$125.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.1M$12.2M$16.3M$19.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.1M$12.1M$16.1M$19.3M
A/R Days Reduction$5.0M$7.4M$9.9M$11.9M
Clean Claim Rate$260K$391K$521K$625K
Total$21.4M$32.1M$42.8M$51.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.8%-5.0%0.3%8.8%
P70
Net-to-Gross25.5%25.2%28.6%33.3%
P26
Occupancy68.7%58.7%75.7%82.4%
P33
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.4M$1.8M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML