Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH PINEVILLE 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH PINEVILLE
CCN 340098 | NC | 365 beds | Current EBITDA $148.1M → Pro Forma $178.4M (+$30.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$575.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$148.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$178.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$30.3M
Modeled Uplift
$21.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.4M (vs $30.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$368K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.5M$11.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.1M$316K$11.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.2M$7.0M$22.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$368K$368K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$184K$368K$368K$368K$368K$368K$368K
Cumulative$0$8.2M$16.5M$24.5M$30.3M$30.3M$30.3M$30.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$148.1M$148.1M25.8%
Year 1$152.6M+$20.2M$172.7M30.0%
Year 2$157.2M+$30.3M$187.4M32.6%
Year 3$161.9M+$30.3M$192.1M33.4%
Year 4$166.7M+$30.3M$197.0M34.2%
Year 5$171.7M+$30.3M$202.0M35.1%
$1.48B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$740.5M
Value Created
$202.0M
Exit EBITDA
$235.9M
Organic Growth
$302.6M
RCM Value Creation
$202.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.7M$8.5M$11.4M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$184K$276K$368K$442K
Total$15.1M$22.7M$30.3M$36.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.8%-6.3%0.6%7.5%
P96
Net-to-Gross24.8%24.6%27.2%31.3%
P33
Occupancy76.9%58.2%75.2%81.4%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML