Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTON HEALTH 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOHNSTON HEALTH
CCN 340090 | NC | 179 beds | Current EBITDA $31.9M → Pro Forma $49.3M (+$17.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$331.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$31.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$49.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$17.5M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $17.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$212K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.6M$6.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.4M$182K$6.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.0M$12.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$212K$212K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$106K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K$212K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.5M$14.2M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M$17.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x
12.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$31.9M$31.9M9.6%
Year 1$32.8M+$11.6M$44.5M13.4%
Year 2$33.8M+$17.5M$51.3M15.5%
Year 3$34.8M+$17.5M$52.3M15.8%
Year 4$35.9M+$17.5M$53.3M16.1%
Year 5$36.9M+$17.5M$54.4M16.4%
$318.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$598.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$279.7M
Value Created
$54.4M
Exit EBITDA
$50.8M
Organic Growth
$174.5M
RCM Value Creation
$54.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$106K$159K$212K$255K
Total$8.7M$13.1M$17.5M$20.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.6%-7.4%-1.2%8.4%
P76
Net-to-Gross24.9%23.7%28.2%34.0%
P32
Occupancy71.9%48.8%58.4%73.5%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.9M$716K$1.2M$1.7M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.7M$732K$1.2M$1.6M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML