Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARNETT HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARNETT HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 340071 | NC | 126 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.9M → Pro Forma $-3.5M (+$6.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$121.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $6.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$78K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$67K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$373K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$78K$78K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$608K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$493K$987K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.9M$-9.9M-8.1%
Year 1$-10.2M+$4.3M$-5.9M-4.9%
Year 2$-10.5M+$6.4M$-4.1M-3.4%
Year 3$-10.8M+$6.4M$-4.4M-3.6%
Year 4$-11.1M+$6.4M$-4.7M-3.9%
Year 5$-11.4M+$6.4M$-5.0M-4.1%
$-98.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-55.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.2M
Value Created
$-5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.7M
Organic Growth
$64.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$58K$78K$93K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.1%-8.1%-1.4%7.0%
P24
Net-to-Gross26.1%24.4%28.8%34.5%
P36
Occupancy60.6%46.8%58.2%74.2%
P56
Rev/Bed$966K$716K$1.2M$1.7M
P31
Exp/Bed$1.0M$732K$1.3M$1.6M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML