Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340070 | NC | 176 beds | Current EBITDA $13.8M → Pro Forma $28.8M (+$15.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$286.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$28.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$15.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.9M (vs $15.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$183K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.7M$5.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$157K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$878K$2.6M$3.5M$11.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$183K$183K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$183K$183K$183K$183K$183K$183K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.2M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
9.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
10.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
11.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x
12.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.8M$13.8M4.8%
Year 1$14.2M+$10.0M$24.2M8.5%
Year 2$14.6M+$15.1M$29.6M10.4%
Year 3$15.0M+$15.1M$30.1M10.5%
Year 4$15.5M+$15.1M$30.5M10.7%
Year 5$15.9M+$15.1M$31.0M10.8%
$137.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$341.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$203.5M
Value Created
$31.0M
Exit EBITDA
$21.9M
Organic Growth
$150.6M
RCM Value Creation
$31.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$137K$183K$220K
Total$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.8%-7.4%-1.2%8.4%
P66
Net-to-Gross28.8%23.7%28.2%34.0%
P56
Occupancy76.0%48.8%58.4%73.5%
P80
Rev/Bed$1.6M$716K$1.2M$1.7M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.5M$732K$1.2M$1.6M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML