Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WRMC HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WRMC HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION
CCN 340064 | NC | 77 beds | Current EBITDA $832K → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$120.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$832K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.3M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$370K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$603K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$597K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$489K$978K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x128% / 61.0x133% / 68.1x137% / 75.3x140% / 78.8x142% / 82.4x
9.0x122% / 53.9x127% / 60.2x132% / 66.6x134% / 69.7x136% / 72.9x
10.0x117% / 48.1x122% / 53.9x126% / 59.6x129% / 62.4x131% / 65.3x
11.0x113% / 43.5x118% / 48.7x122% / 53.9x124% / 56.5x126% / 59.1x
12.0x109% / 39.6x113% / 44.4x118% / 49.1x120% / 51.5x122% / 53.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
85%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 85% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$832K$832K0.7%
Year 1$857K+$4.2M$5.1M4.2%
Year 2$882K+$6.3M$7.2M6.0%
Year 3$909K+$6.3M$7.3M6.0%
Year 4$936K+$6.3M$7.3M6.0%
Year 5$964K+$6.3M$7.3M6.1%
$8.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$80.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$72.1M
Value Created
$7.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.3M
Organic Growth
$63.4M
RCM Value Creation
$7.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$734K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$58K$77K$93K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-8.8%-1.9%12.0%
P57
Net-to-Gross28.3%22.8%28.7%37.7%
P43
Occupancy52.4%40.3%52.9%71.2%
P48
Rev/Bed$1.6M$512K$1.1M$1.5M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.6M$568K$1.1M$1.5M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML