Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — S.E. REGL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — S.E. REGL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 340050 | NC | 179 beds | Current EBITDA $-75.4M → Pro Forma $-59.7M (+$15.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$298.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-75.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-59.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$15.7M
Modeled Uplift
$11.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.3M (vs $15.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$191K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$164K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$915K$2.7M$3.6M$11.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$191K$191K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$95K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.5M$12.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-75.4M$-75.4M-25.3%
Year 1$-77.7M+$10.5M$-67.2M-22.5%
Year 2$-80.0M+$15.7M$-64.3M-21.6%
Year 3$-82.4M+$15.7M$-66.7M-22.4%
Year 4$-84.9M+$15.7M$-69.2M-23.2%
Year 5$-87.4M+$15.7M$-71.7M-24.1%
$-753.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-788.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-34.9M
Value Created
$-71.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-120.1M
Organic Growth
$156.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-71.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$95K$143K$191K$229K
Total$7.8M$11.8M$15.7M$18.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.3%-7.4%-1.2%8.4%
P4
Net-to-Gross33.0%23.7%28.2%34.0%
P68
Occupancy77.2%48.8%58.4%73.5%
P82
Rev/Bed$1.7M$716K$1.2M$1.7M
P74
Exp/Bed$2.1M$732K$1.2M$1.6M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML