Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ONSLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ONSLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 340042 | NC | 162 beds | Current EBITDA $7.4M → Pro Forma $15.6M (+$8.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$155.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$8.2M
Modeled Uplift
$5.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.4M (vs $8.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$99K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.1M$3.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.0M$85K$3.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$477K$1.4M$1.9M$6.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$99K$99K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$777K$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$769K$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$630K$1.3M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$50K$99K$99K$99K$99K$99K$99K
Cumulative$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.6M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
9.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
10.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x
11.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
12.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.4M$7.4M4.8%
Year 1$7.6M+$5.4M$13.1M8.4%
Year 2$7.8M+$8.2M$16.0M10.3%
Year 3$8.1M+$8.2M$16.2M10.5%
Year 4$8.3M+$8.2M$16.5M10.6%
Year 5$8.6M+$8.2M$16.7M10.8%
$73.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$184.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$110.3M
Value Created
$16.7M
Exit EBITDA
$11.8M
Organic Growth
$81.7M
RCM Value Creation
$16.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$945K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$50K$75K$99K$119K
Total$4.1M$6.1M$8.2M$9.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.8%-8.0%-1.3%7.0%
P66
Net-to-Gross33.0%23.5%28.6%34.1%
P70
Occupancy52.4%46.1%58.1%72.5%
P35
Rev/Bed$959K$781K$1.2M$1.7M
P28
Exp/Bed$914K$761K$1.2M$1.6M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML