Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 05:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORSYTH MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
CCN 340014 | NC | 906 beds | Current EBITDA $-96.1M → Pro Forma $-24.6M (+$71.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.36B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-96.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$71.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-24.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$52.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$71.5M
Modeled Uplift
$45.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$26.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $45.1M (vs $71.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$27.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$26.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$870K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$71.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$27.2M$27.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$26.2M$748K$26.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.2M$12.4M$16.5M$52.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$870K$870K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.7M$13.5M$20.2M$26.9M$26.9M$26.9M$26.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$435K$870K$870K$870K$870K$870K$870K
Cumulative$0$19.5M$39.0M$58.0M$71.5M$71.5M$71.5M$71.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $71.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-96.1M$-96.1M-7.1%
Year 1$-99.0M+$47.7M$-51.3M-3.8%
Year 2$-102.0M+$71.5M$-30.5M-2.2%
Year 3$-105.0M+$71.5M$-33.5M-2.5%
Year 4$-108.2M+$71.5M$-36.7M-2.7%
Year 5$-111.4M+$71.5M$-39.9M-2.9%
$-961.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-439.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$522.2M
Value Created
$-39.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-153.1M
Organic Growth
$715.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-39.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$32.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.5M$20.2M$26.9M$32.3M
A/R Days Reduction$8.3M$12.4M$16.5M$19.9M
Clean Claim Rate$435K$653K$870K$1.0M
Total$35.8M$53.6M$71.5M$85.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.1%-5.5%-4.3%-0.8%
P15
Net-to-Gross31.1%26.9%30.4%31.4%
P62
Occupancy66.4%76.3%80.2%88.8%
P8
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.6M$1.9M$2.7M
P15
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$2.1M$2.9M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML