Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WAYNE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 340010 | NC | 245 beds | Current EBITDA $26.2M → Pro Forma $41.7M (+$15.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$295.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$41.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$15.5M
Modeled Uplift
$10.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.4M (vs $15.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$189K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$162K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$906K$2.7M$3.6M$11.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$189K$189K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$94K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K$189K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.5M$12.6M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
11.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.2M$26.2M8.9%
Year 1$26.9M+$10.3M$37.3M12.6%
Year 2$27.8M+$15.5M$43.3M14.7%
Year 3$28.6M+$15.5M$44.1M14.9%
Year 4$29.4M+$15.5M$45.0M15.2%
Year 5$30.3M+$15.5M$45.9M15.5%
$261.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$504.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$242.8M
Value Created
$45.9M
Exit EBITDA
$41.7M
Organic Growth
$155.2M
RCM Value Creation
$45.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$94K$142K$189K$227K
Total$7.8M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.9%-5.6%2.8%8.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross37.8%24.7%27.4%32.8%
P84
Occupancy57.0%53.4%65.1%77.4%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.2M$961K$1.4M$1.7M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.1M$789K$1.2M$1.6M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML