Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH CABARRUS 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH CABARRUS
CCN 340001 | NC | 447 beds | Current EBITDA $105.5M → Pro Forma $145.4M (+$39.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$758.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$105.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$39.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$145.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$39.9M
Modeled Uplift
$29.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.0M (vs $39.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$486K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$39.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.2M$15.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.6M$417K$15.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.2M$29.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$486K$486K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$243K$486K$486K$486K$486K$486K$486K
Cumulative$0$10.9M$21.7M$32.4M$39.9M$39.9M$39.9M$39.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $39.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$105.5M$105.5M13.9%
Year 1$108.7M+$26.6M$135.3M17.8%
Year 2$111.9M+$39.9M$151.9M20.0%
Year 3$115.3M+$39.9M$155.2M20.5%
Year 4$118.8M+$39.9M$158.7M20.9%
Year 5$122.3M+$39.9M$162.3M21.4%
$1.06B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.78B
Exit EV (11x)
$729.6M
Value Created
$162.3M
Exit EBITDA
$168.1M
Organic Growth
$399.3M
RCM Value Creation
$162.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$18.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$243K$364K$486K$583K
Total$20.0M$29.9M$39.9M$47.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 24 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.9%-5.0%0.3%8.8%
P87
Net-to-Gross23.9%25.2%28.6%33.3%
P13
Occupancy88.4%58.7%75.7%82.4%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.2M$1.5M$1.8M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.4M$1.8M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML