Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FOUR WINDS OF SARATOGA INC. 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FOUR WINDS OF SARATOGA INC.
CCN 334049 | NY | 88 beds | Current EBITDA $476K → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$476K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$477K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$737K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$729K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$448K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$737K$737K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$709K$20K$729K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$113K$335K$448K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$184K$368K$553K$737K$737K$737K$737K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$182K$365K$547K$729K$729K$729K$729K
A/R Days Reduction$0$149K$299K$448K$448K$448K$448K$448K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$528K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.0x108% / 39.2x113% / 43.5x115% / 45.6x117% / 47.7x
9.0x98% / 30.7x103% / 34.5x107% / 38.3x109% / 40.2x111% / 42.0x
10.0x94% / 27.3x98% / 30.7x103% / 34.1x105% / 35.8x106% / 37.5x
11.0x90% / 24.6x94% / 27.6x98% / 30.7x100% / 32.3x102% / 33.8x
12.0x86% / 22.2x90% / 25.1x95% / 27.9x97% / 29.3x98% / 30.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
74%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 74% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$476K$476K1.3%
Year 1$491K+$1.3M$1.8M4.8%
Year 2$505K+$1.9M$2.4M6.6%
Year 3$521K+$1.9M$2.5M6.7%
Year 4$536K+$1.9M$2.5M6.7%
Year 5$552K+$1.9M$2.5M6.8%
$4.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.6M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$759K
Organic Growth
$19.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$368K$553K$737K$884K
Denial Rate Reductio$365K$547K$729K$875K
A/R Days Reduction$224K$336K$448K$538K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$969K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-29.4%-17.8%-9.3%
P90
Net-to-Gross62.8%27.0%33.9%39.2%
P97
Occupancy98.0%44.3%59.0%75.7%
P94
Rev/Bed$419K$890K$1.3M$1.8M
P7
Exp/Bed$413K$795K$1.4M$1.9M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML