Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BASSETT HOSPITAL OF SCHOHARIE COUNTY 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BASSETT HOSPITAL OF SCHOHARIE COUNTY
CCN 331320 | NY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $7.6M → Pro Forma $9.8M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$695K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$810K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$802K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$493K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$810K$810K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$780K$22K$802K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$124K$369K$493K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$203K$405K$608K$810K$810K$810K$810K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$200K$401K$601K$802K$802K$802K$802K
A/R Days Reduction$0$164K$329K$493K$493K$493K$493K$493K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$580K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.6M$7.6M18.9%
Year 1$7.9M+$1.4M$9.3M22.9%
Year 2$8.1M+$2.1M$10.2M25.3%
Year 3$8.4M+$2.1M$10.5M25.9%
Year 4$8.6M+$2.1M$10.7M26.5%
Year 5$8.9M+$2.1M$11.0M27.1%
$76.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$120.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.5M
Value Created
$11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$12.2M
Organic Growth
$21.3M
RCM Value Creation
$11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$405K$608K$810K$972K
Denial Rate Reductio$401K$601K$802K$962K
A/R Days Reduction$246K$370K$493K$591K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.9%-27.8%-17.7%-9.7%
P93
Net-to-Gross46.1%37.6%44.3%46.9%
P67
Occupancy44.6%30.3%44.2%63.6%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.6M$998K$1.3M$2.0M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML