Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARGARETVILLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARGARETVILLE HOSPITAL
CCN 331304 | NY | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.3M → Pro Forma $-11.5M (+$797K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$797K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-11.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$581K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$797K
Modeled Uplift
$499K
Risk-Adjusted
-$298K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$303K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$300K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$184K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$797K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$303K$303K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$292K$8K$300K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$138K$184K$581K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$76K$152K$227K$303K$303K$303K$303K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$75K$150K$225K$300K$300K$300K$300K
A/R Days Reduction$0$61K$123K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$217K$434K$646K$797K$797K$797K$797K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $797K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.3M$-12.3M-80.9%
Year 1$-12.6M+$532K$-12.1M-79.9%
Year 2$-13.0M+$797K$-12.2M-80.6%
Year 3$-13.4M+$797K$-12.6M-83.2%
Year 4$-13.8M+$797K$-13.0M-85.8%
Year 5$-14.2M+$797K$-13.4M-88.6%
$-122.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-147.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-25.0M
Value Created
$-13.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-19.5M
Organic Growth
$8.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-13.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$152K$227K$303K$364K
Denial Rate Reductio$150K$225K$300K$360K
A/R Days Reduction$92K$138K$184K$221K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$399K$598K$797K$957K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-26.5%-14.7%-7.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross40.9%40.9%44.3%49.0%
P24
Occupancy27.9%31.4%44.2%63.6%
P15
Rev/Bed$1.0M$994K$1.3M$1.9M
P28
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.6M$2.3M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML