Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GARNET HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - CATSK 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GARNET HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - CATSK
CCN 331303 | NY | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $6.2M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$595K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$595K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$431K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$595K
Modeled Uplift
$364K
Risk-Adjusted
-$231K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$225K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$224K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$137K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$595K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$216K$8K$224K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$102K$137K$431K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$112K$168K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$112K$168K$224K$224K$224K$224K
A/R Days Reduction$0$46K$91K$137K$137K$137K$137K$137K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$163K$325K$483K$595K$595K$595K$595K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $595K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
9.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
10.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
11.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x
12.0x23% / 2.9x29% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x36% / 4.6x37% / 4.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.2x
Headroom (turns)
-19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.7x, adding 0.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.2M$6.2M55.3%
Year 1$6.4M+$397K$6.8M60.5%
Year 2$6.6M+$595K$7.2M64.0%
Year 3$6.8M+$595K$7.4M65.8%
Year 4$7.0M+$595K$7.6M67.6%
Year 5$7.2M+$595K$7.8M69.5%
$62.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$85.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.7M
Value Created
$7.8M
Exit EBITDA
$9.9M
Organic Growth
$6.0M
RCM Value Creation
$7.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$112K$168K$225K$270K
Denial Rate Reductio$112K$168K$224K$269K
A/R Days Reduction$68K$102K$137K$164K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$298K$446K$595K$714K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin55.3%-26.5%-14.7%-7.8%
P96
Net-to-Gross34.7%40.9%44.3%49.0%
P8
Occupancy18.1%31.4%44.2%63.6%
P12
Rev/Bed$749K$994K$1.3M$1.9M
P12
Exp/Bed$334K$1.2M$1.6M$2.3M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML