Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ELIZABETHTOWN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ELIZABETHTOWN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 331302 | NY | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.7M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$769K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$948K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$939K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$577K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$948K$948K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$913K$26K$939K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$145K$431K$577K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$237K$474K$711K$948K$948K$948K$948K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$235K$469K$704K$939K$939K$939K$939K
A/R Days Reduction$0$192K$385K$577K$577K$577K$577K$577K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$679K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.7M$-3.7M-7.8%
Year 1$-3.8M+$1.7M$-2.2M-4.6%
Year 2$-3.9M+$2.5M$-1.4M-3.0%
Year 3$-4.1M+$2.5M$-1.6M-3.3%
Year 4$-4.2M+$2.5M$-1.7M-3.6%
Year 5$-4.3M+$2.5M$-1.8M-3.8%
$-37.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-19.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.2M
Value Created
$-1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.9M
Organic Growth
$24.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$474K$711K$948K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$469K$704K$939K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$288K$433K$577K$692K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.8%-27.8%-17.7%-9.7%
P77
Net-to-Gross44.2%37.6%44.3%46.9%
P47
Occupancy52.7%30.3%44.2%63.6%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.9M$998K$1.3M$2.0M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML