Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SBH HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SBH HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 330399 | NY | 283 beds | Current EBITDA $-66.4M → Pro Forma $-43.7M (+$22.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$431.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-66.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-43.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$22.7M
Modeled Uplift
$15.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.6M (vs $22.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$276K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.6M$8.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.3M$237K$8.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.3M$16.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$276K$276K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$138K$276K$276K$276K$276K$276K$276K
Cumulative$0$6.2M$12.4M$18.4M$22.7M$22.7M$22.7M$22.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-66.4M$-66.4M-15.4%
Year 1$-68.4M+$15.1M$-53.2M-12.3%
Year 2$-70.4M+$22.7M$-47.7M-11.1%
Year 3$-72.5M+$22.7M$-49.8M-11.5%
Year 4$-74.7M+$22.7M$-52.0M-12.0%
Year 5$-76.9M+$22.7M$-54.2M-12.6%
$-663.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-596.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.1M
Value Created
$-54.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-105.7M
Organic Growth
$227.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-54.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.9M$5.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$138K$207K$276K$331K
Total$11.4M$17.0M$22.7M$27.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.4%-27.9%-17.7%-9.1%
P60
Net-to-Gross42.5%25.8%32.8%42.6%
P73
Occupancy66.7%61.6%76.4%84.2%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.5M$2.2M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.8M$995K$1.7M$2.5M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML