Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 06:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
CCN 330354 | NY | 142 beds | Current EBITDA $-309.8M → Pro Forma $-269.2M (+$40.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$772.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-309.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-269.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$40.6M
Modeled Uplift
$32.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $32.1M (vs $40.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$494K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.4M$15.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.9M$425K$15.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.0M$9.4M$29.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$494K$494K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.6M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.5M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$247K$494K$494K$494K$494K$494K$494K
Cumulative$0$11.1M$22.1M$32.9M$40.6M$40.6M$40.6M$40.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-309.8M$-309.8M-40.1%
Year 1$-319.1M+$27.1M$-292.0M-37.8%
Year 2$-328.7M+$40.6M$-288.0M-37.3%
Year 3$-338.5M+$40.6M$-297.9M-38.6%
Year 4$-348.7M+$40.6M$-308.0M-39.9%
Year 5$-359.1M+$40.6M$-318.5M-41.2%
$-3.10B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.50B
Exit EV (11x)
$-405.6M
Value Created
$-318.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-493.4M
Organic Growth
$406.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-318.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.7M$11.6M$15.4M$18.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.3M
Clean Claim Rate$247K$371K$494K$593K
Total$20.3M$30.5M$40.6M$48.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-40.1%-26.9%-16.7%-9.3%
P9
Net-to-Gross32.9%26.4%34.1%41.7%
P47
Occupancy84.5%50.5%65.1%80.3%
P82
Rev/Bed$5.4M$883K$1.4M$1.9M
P97
Exp/Bed$7.6M$628K$1.4M$2.1M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML