Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF BROOKLYN 2026-04-26 14:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF BROOKLYN
CCN 330350 | NY | 305 beds | Current EBITDA $-167.0M → Pro Forma $-147.9M (+$19.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$363.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-167.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-147.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$19.1M
Modeled Uplift
$12.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.2M (vs $19.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$232K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.0M$200K$7.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$232K$232K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$116K$232K$232K$232K$232K$232K$232K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.5M$19.1M$19.1M$19.1M$19.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-167.0M$-167.0M-46.0%
Year 1$-172.0M+$12.7M$-159.3M-43.9%
Year 2$-177.2M+$19.1M$-158.1M-43.5%
Year 3$-182.5M+$19.1M$-163.4M-45.0%
Year 4$-188.0M+$19.1M$-168.9M-46.5%
Year 5$-193.6M+$19.1M$-174.5M-48.1%
$-1.67B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.92B
Exit EV (11x)
$-249.5M
Value Created
$-174.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-266.0M
Organic Growth
$191.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-174.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.3M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$116K$174K$232K$279K
Total$9.6M$14.3M$19.1M$22.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-46.0%-27.7%-17.7%-9.1%
P5
Net-to-Gross38.9%25.8%33.3%42.6%
P62
Occupancy45.8%61.5%74.3%82.9%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.2M$1.5M$2.2M
P24
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.0M$1.7M$2.5M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML