Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AT SYRACUSE 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AT SYRACUSE
CCN 330241 | NY | 625 beds | Current EBITDA $-229.5M → Pro Forma $-159.5M (+$70.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.33B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-229.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$70.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-159.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$51.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$70.0M
Modeled Uplift
$48.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$21.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $48.8M (vs $70.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$26.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$26.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$852K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$70.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$26.6M$26.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$25.6M$732K$26.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.1M$12.1M$16.2M$51.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$852K$852K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.7M$13.3M$20.0M$26.6M$26.6M$26.6M$26.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.6M$13.2M$19.8M$26.4M$26.4M$26.4M$26.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$426K$852K$852K$852K$852K$852K$852K
Cumulative$0$19.1M$38.1M$56.8M$70.0M$70.0M$70.0M$70.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $70.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-229.5M$-229.5M-17.2%
Year 1$-236.4M+$46.7M$-189.7M-14.3%
Year 2$-243.5M+$70.0M$-173.5M-13.0%
Year 3$-250.8M+$70.0M$-180.8M-13.6%
Year 4$-258.3M+$70.0M$-188.3M-14.1%
Year 5$-266.1M+$70.0M$-196.1M-14.7%
$-2.30B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.16B
Exit EV (11x)
$138.7M
Value Created
$-196.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-365.6M
Organic Growth
$700.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-196.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.3M$20.0M$26.6M$31.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.2M$19.8M$26.4M$31.6M
A/R Days Reduction$8.1M$12.1M$16.2M$19.4M
Clean Claim Rate$426K$639K$852K$1.0M
Total$35.0M$52.5M$70.0M$84.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.2%-27.7%-18.4%-7.3%
P53
Net-to-Gross26.5%26.1%32.2%41.5%
P26
Occupancy80.0%77.2%81.1%87.7%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.4M$1.9M$2.5M
P55
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML