Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARLEM HOSPITAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARLEM HOSPITAL CENTER
CCN 330240 | NY | 217 beds | Current EBITDA $-119.1M → Pro Forma $-91.8M (+$27.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$519.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-119.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-91.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$27.3M
Modeled Uplift
$19.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.6M (vs $27.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$333K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.4M$10.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.0M$286K$10.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$19.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$333K$333K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$166K$333K$333K$333K$333K$333K$333K
Cumulative$0$7.4M$14.9M$22.2M$27.3M$27.3M$27.3M$27.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-119.1M$-119.1M-22.9%
Year 1$-122.7M+$18.2M$-104.5M-20.1%
Year 2$-126.4M+$27.3M$-99.1M-19.1%
Year 3$-130.2M+$27.3M$-102.8M-19.8%
Year 4$-134.1M+$27.3M$-106.7M-20.5%
Year 5$-138.1M+$27.3M$-110.8M-21.3%
$-1.19B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$-27.1M
Value Created
$-110.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-189.7M
Organic Growth
$273.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-110.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.8M$10.4M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.1M$7.7M$10.3M$12.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$166K$249K$333K$399K
Total$13.7M$20.5M$27.3M$32.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.9%-28.4%-17.8%-9.4%
P33
Net-to-Gross50.0%26.4%32.6%41.8%
P88
Occupancy73.4%55.2%69.2%81.8%
P55
Rev/Bed$2.4M$908K$1.4M$2.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.9M$821K$1.6M$2.3M
P90

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML