Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN/BROOKLYN METHO 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN/BROOKLYN METHO
CCN 330236 | NY | 516 beds | Current EBITDA $-135.0M → Pro Forma $-100.4M (+$34.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$658.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-135.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-100.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$34.6M
Modeled Uplift
$24.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.1M (vs $34.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$421K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.2M$13.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.7M$362K$13.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.0M$25.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$421K$421K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M$13.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$211K$421K$421K$421K$421K$421K$421K
Cumulative$0$9.4M$18.9M$28.1M$34.6M$34.6M$34.6M$34.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-135.0M$-135.0M-20.5%
Year 1$-139.1M+$23.1M$-116.0M-17.6%
Year 2$-143.3M+$34.6M$-108.6M-16.5%
Year 3$-147.6M+$34.6M$-112.9M-17.2%
Year 4$-152.0M+$34.6M$-117.4M-17.8%
Year 5$-156.5M+$34.6M$-121.9M-18.5%
$-1.35B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.34B
Exit EV (11x)
$9.3M
Value Created
$-121.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-215.1M
Organic Growth
$346.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-121.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.8M$13.0M$15.6M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$211K$316K$421K$505K
Total$17.3M$26.0M$34.6M$41.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.5%-27.5%-18.2%-8.9%
P42
Net-to-Gross26.0%25.7%32.6%41.8%
P26
Occupancy79.7%69.1%80.0%87.9%
P47
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M
P20
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.4M$2.2M$2.7M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML