Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOKDALE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 330233 | NY | 498 beds | Current EBITDA $-539.8M → Pro Forma $-503.4M (+$36.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$692.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-539.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-503.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$36.4M
Modeled Uplift
$25.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.2M (vs $36.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$443K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.8M$13.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.3M$381K$13.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$443K$443K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$222K$443K$443K$443K$443K$443K$443K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.8M$29.5M$36.4M$36.4M$36.4M$36.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-539.8M$-539.8M-78.0%
Year 1$-556.0M+$24.3M$-531.7M-76.8%
Year 2$-572.7M+$36.4M$-536.3M-77.5%
Year 3$-589.9M+$36.4M$-553.4M-79.9%
Year 4$-607.6M+$36.4M$-571.1M-82.5%
Year 5$-625.8M+$36.4M$-589.4M-85.1%
$-5.40B
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.48B
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.08B
Value Created
$-589.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-859.8M
Organic Growth
$364.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-589.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$16.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$16.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$222K$332K$443K$532K
Total$18.2M$27.3M$36.4M$43.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-26.5%-17.6%-8.9%
P0
Net-to-Gross41.0%25.3%32.5%41.7%
P71
Occupancy79.1%68.9%79.6%87.7%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P29
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML