Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — QUEENS HOSPITAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — QUEENS HOSPITAL CENTER
CCN 330231 | NY | 200 beds | Current EBITDA $31.4M → Pro Forma $64.9M (+$33.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$637.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$31.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$33.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$64.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$33.5M
Modeled Uplift
$25.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.3M (vs $33.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$408K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$33.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.7M$12.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.3M$350K$12.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$5.8M$7.8M$24.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$408K$408K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M$12.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$204K$408K$408K$408K$408K$408K$408K
Cumulative$0$9.1M$18.3M$27.2M$33.5M$33.5M$33.5M$33.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $33.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x67% / 13.0x72% / 14.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
9.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.1x
10.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
11.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
12.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.4x
Headroom (turns)
37%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 37% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.1x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$31.4M$31.4M4.9%
Year 1$32.3M+$22.3M$54.7M8.6%
Year 2$33.3M+$33.5M$66.8M10.5%
Year 3$34.3M+$33.5M$67.8M10.6%
Year 4$35.3M+$33.5M$68.9M10.8%
Year 5$36.4M+$33.5M$69.9M11.0%
$313.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$769.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$455.2M
Value Created
$69.9M
Exit EBITDA
$50.0M
Organic Growth
$335.2M
RCM Value Creation
$69.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.4M$9.6M$12.7M$15.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$204K$306K$408K$489K
Total$16.8M$25.1M$33.5M$40.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.9%-27.7%-17.6%-9.4%
P97
Net-to-Gross45.3%26.4%33.4%41.8%
P84
Occupancy84.2%52.9%69.0%82.1%
P78
Rev/Bed$3.2M$917K$1.4M$2.0M
P95
Exp/Bed$3.0M$819K$1.6M$2.3M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML