Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 330221 | NY | 240 beds | Current EBITDA $-67.7M → Pro Forma $-50.9M (+$16.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$319.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-67.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-50.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$16.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.6M (vs $16.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$205K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$176K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$982K$2.9M$3.9M$12.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$205K$205K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$102K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K$205K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.6M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M$16.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-67.7M$-67.7M-21.2%
Year 1$-69.8M+$11.2M$-58.6M-18.3%
Year 2$-71.9M+$16.8M$-55.0M-17.2%
Year 3$-74.0M+$16.8M$-57.2M-17.9%
Year 4$-76.2M+$16.8M$-59.4M-18.6%
Year 5$-78.5M+$16.8M$-61.7M-19.3%
$-677.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-678.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.3M
Value Created
$-61.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-107.9M
Organic Growth
$168.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-61.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$102K$154K$205K$246K
Total$8.4M$12.6M$16.8M$20.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.2%-27.9%-17.6%-9.3%
P38
Net-to-Gross37.2%25.8%32.6%42.4%
P60
Occupancy66.5%58.4%73.4%83.3%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.3M$937K$1.5M$2.2M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.6M$973K$1.6M$2.4M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML