Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NYC HEALTH+HOSPITAL/KINGS COUNTY 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NYC HEALTH+HOSPITAL/KINGS COUNTY
CCN 330202 | NY | 381 beds | Current EBITDA $-153.6M → Pro Forma $-99.6M (+$54.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.03B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-153.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$54.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-99.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$39.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$54.0M
Modeled Uplift
$39.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $39.0M (vs $54.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$20.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$20.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$12.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$657K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$54.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$20.5M$20.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$19.8M$565K$20.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.2M$9.3M$12.5M$39.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$657K$657K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.1M$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.3M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.2M$8.3M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$329K$657K$657K$657K$657K$657K$657K
Cumulative$0$14.7M$29.4M$43.8M$54.0M$54.0M$54.0M$54.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $54.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-153.6M$-153.6M-15.0%
Year 1$-158.2M+$36.0M$-122.2M-11.9%
Year 2$-163.0M+$54.0M$-108.9M-10.6%
Year 3$-167.9M+$54.0M$-113.8M-11.1%
Year 4$-172.9M+$54.0M$-118.9M-11.6%
Year 5$-178.1M+$54.0M$-124.1M-12.1%
$-1.54B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$171.6M
Value Created
$-124.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-244.7M
Organic Growth
$540.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-124.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.3M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.2M$15.3M$20.3M$24.4M
A/R Days Reduction$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
Clean Claim Rate$329K$493K$657K$789K
Total$27.0M$40.5M$54.0M$64.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.0%-26.5%-17.5%-9.0%
P62
Net-to-Gross45.4%25.7%32.8%42.5%
P86
Occupancy79.6%62.3%78.3%86.4%
P55
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M
P90
Exp/Bed$3.1M$1.1M$1.9M$2.5M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML