Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL
CCN 330198 | NY | 312 beds | Current EBITDA $-112.9M → Pro Forma $-81.6M (+$31.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$594.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-112.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-81.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$31.3M
Modeled Uplift
$23.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.0M (vs $31.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$380K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.9M$11.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.4M$327K$11.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.4M$7.2M$22.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$380K$380K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M$11.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$190K$380K$380K$380K$380K$380K$380K
Cumulative$0$8.5M$17.0M$25.3M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M$31.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-112.9M$-112.9M-19.0%
Year 1$-116.3M+$20.8M$-95.4M-16.1%
Year 2$-119.7M+$31.3M$-88.5M-14.9%
Year 3$-123.3M+$31.3M$-92.1M-15.5%
Year 4$-127.0M+$31.3M$-95.8M-16.1%
Year 5$-130.8M+$31.3M$-99.6M-16.8%
$-1.13B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.10B
Exit EV (11x)
$33.2M
Value Created
$-99.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-179.8M
Organic Growth
$312.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-99.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$14.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.9M$8.8M$11.8M$14.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.7M
Clean Claim Rate$190K$285K$380K$456K
Total$15.6M$23.4M$31.3M$37.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.0%-27.2%-17.7%-9.1%
P41
Net-to-Gross15.5%25.6%33.3%42.6%
P3
Occupancy81.8%61.5%75.7%83.4%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.6M$2.2M
P63
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.0M$1.7M$2.5M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML