Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 330194 | NY | 641 beds | Current EBITDA $-317.9M → Pro Forma $-254.8M (+$63.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.20B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-317.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$63.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-254.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$46.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$63.1M
Modeled Uplift
$44.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $44.0M (vs $63.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$768K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$63.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.0M$24.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.1M$660K$23.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.7M$10.9M$14.6M$46.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$768K$768K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.0M$12.0M$18.0M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.9M$11.9M$17.8M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.9M$9.7M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M$14.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$384K$768K$768K$768K$768K$768K$768K
Cumulative$0$17.2M$34.4M$51.2M$63.1M$63.1M$63.1M$63.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $63.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-317.9M$-317.9M-26.5%
Year 1$-327.5M+$42.1M$-285.4M-23.8%
Year 2$-337.3M+$63.1M$-274.1M-22.8%
Year 3$-347.4M+$63.1M$-284.3M-23.7%
Year 4$-357.8M+$63.1M$-294.7M-24.6%
Year 5$-368.6M+$63.1M$-305.4M-25.4%
$-3.18B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$-180.4M
Value Created
$-305.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-506.4M
Organic Growth
$631.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-305.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.0M$18.0M$24.0M$28.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.9M$17.8M$23.8M$28.5M
A/R Days Reduction$7.3M$11.0M$14.6M$17.5M
Clean Claim Rate$384K$576K$768K$922K
Total$31.6M$47.4M$63.1M$75.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-26.5%-27.3%-17.4%-6.4%
P31
Net-to-Gross24.1%25.6%32.2%41.6%
P17
Occupancy81.6%77.5%81.5%88.1%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.5M$2.0M$2.5M
P44
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML