Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GLENS FALLS HOSPITAL
CCN 330191 | NY | 391 beds | Current EBITDA $-53.4M → Pro Forma $-35.7M (+$17.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$335.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-53.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-35.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$17.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.9M (vs $17.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$215K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.7M$6.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.5M$185K$6.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.1M$4.1M$12.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$215K$215K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$107K$215K$215K$215K$215K$215K$215K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.3M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-53.4M$-53.4M-15.9%
Year 1$-55.0M+$11.8M$-43.2M-12.9%
Year 2$-56.6M+$17.7M$-39.0M-11.6%
Year 3$-58.3M+$17.7M$-40.7M-12.1%
Year 4$-60.1M+$17.7M$-42.4M-12.6%
Year 5$-61.9M+$17.7M$-44.2M-13.2%
$-533.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-486.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.5M
Value Created
$-44.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-85.0M
Organic Growth
$176.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-44.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$5.0M$6.6M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$107K$161K$215K$258K
Total$8.8M$13.3M$17.7M$21.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.9%-26.6%-17.6%-9.4%
P59
Net-to-Gross32.0%25.6%34.0%42.6%
P43
Occupancy41.1%66.5%79.1%87.4%
P4
Rev/Bed$859K$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P12
Exp/Bed$995K$1.1M$1.9M$2.6M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML