Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
CCN 330182 | NY | 364 beds | Current EBITDA $17.4M → Pro Forma $64.2M (+$46.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$889.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$46.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$64.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$34.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$46.8M
Modeled Uplift
$34.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $34.2M (vs $46.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$569K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$46.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.8M$17.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.1M$489K$17.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.7M$8.1M$10.8M$34.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$569K$569K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M$17.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$285K$569K$569K$569K$569K$569K$569K
Cumulative$0$12.7M$25.5M$37.9M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $46.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x90% / 24.9x95% / 28.0x99% / 31.1x101% / 32.7x103% / 34.3x
9.0x85% / 21.8x90% / 24.5x94% / 27.3x96% / 28.7x98% / 30.1x
10.0x81% / 19.3x85% / 21.8x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.5x93% / 26.8x
11.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.0x
12.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
65%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 65% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.4M$17.4M2.0%
Year 1$17.9M+$31.2M$49.1M5.5%
Year 2$18.5M+$46.8M$65.2M7.3%
Year 3$19.0M+$46.8M$65.8M7.4%
Year 4$19.6M+$46.8M$66.4M7.5%
Year 5$20.2M+$46.8M$67.0M7.5%
$174.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$736.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$562.5M
Value Created
$67.0M
Exit EBITDA
$27.7M
Organic Growth
$467.9M
RCM Value Creation
$67.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$21.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.8M$13.2M$17.6M$21.1M
A/R Days Reduction$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Clean Claim Rate$285K$427K$569K$683K
Total$23.4M$35.1M$46.8M$56.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.0%-26.5%-17.5%-9.0%
P93
Net-to-Gross21.8%25.7%32.6%42.1%
P12
Occupancy76.4%62.3%77.7%84.7%
P45
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P86
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.8M$2.5M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML